Senator Marco Rubio has a lot in common with Barack Hussein Obama. Obama was politically nurtured in Socialism from the cradle by his parents and other anti-American mentors. Media political pundits credit Obama with being intelligent without any evidence to prove so. Obama rode the affirmative action / political correctness tidal wave to the highest elected office. In lieu of qualifications, his meteoric political rise was based on nothing more than his race and his willingness to be a facade for others whose corruption and political agendas are unacceptable to the majority of Americans. White guilt and an entitlement mentality so skillfully administered by politicians and Clower-Piven enabled someone with no proven administrative or leadership experience to gain the most powerful political position in the world. This avoidance of confronting race and greed prohibited a fair vetting of Obama’s birth and political credentials. I believe it will eventually be proven Obama was America’s first illegal alien president.
Although Senator Marco Rubio was born in the United States his parents were not. Much ado has been made of Rubio’s “Great American Story”. But considering Rubio was born among those generations of immigrant children who have not acculturated into the American identity, what indicates Rubio is not one of them? Does being a member of the Republican Party provide unquestionable bona fides of loyalty to the American Identity? No. There are many Republicans in all levels of elected office who are selling their political souls to racial and ethnic identity issues in order to remain in office. Rubio rose through the ranks among a strongly Hispanic population. He is now a leading voice among the “Gang (appropriately) of Eight” pushing through immigration “reform.” Both Obama and Rubio rose to power by representing an acceptable (non-threatening) face to the power brokers and mouthing standard sound bites to the American people. Their actions belie the sound bites. After all, they are both -to the core- politicians (vs. statesmen) whose prime directive is re-election
It is interesting “reform” measures never tighten the laws governing gaining American citizenship. Despite guarantees from such an icon of integrity as Ted Kennedy that the fears of social experts would not come true the Immigration Reform Act of 1965 did turn the historical immigration policy of the United States upside down and began the ethnic revolution mushrooming like a nuclear cloud on the American Identity. A few years after the ’65 legislation the Census Bureau projected Caucasians (whites) would be a minority for the first time by the year 2050. Senator Marco Rubio’s immigration bill would drastically reduce that date to approximately the end of this decade. Assurances of stricter enforcement, increases in budgets for technology and numbers of border patrol agents have been promises almost annually since the ’65 act. None have actually been budgeted or enforced. Tens of millions of dollars allocated for technology have been squandered on executive boondoggles. Thousands of computers sit in rooms collecting dust (and other forms of techie subterfuge similar to the 2012 voting booth fraud). The raw numbers of “additional” agents never keep pace with the numbers using the border patrol academy as a pathway to civilian law enforcement – or quitting out of frustration at not being able to enforce the law. Instead ICE and Border Patrol agents are ordered to release criminal aliens from prisons and not arrest illegals in the field.
It reminds me of the story of a man who was walking down a country road one day and spied a snake in the middle of the road. It was hot and a long way down the hill. As the man approached the snake asked the man if he would put him in his pocket and carry him down the hill. “But you’re a snake!” the man replied. “You might bite me!” “I wouldn’t think of biting such a generous man after doing such a kind deed!” replied the snake. So the man picked up the snake and put him in his pocket. After reaching the bottom of the hill the man reached into his pocket to retrieve the snake. The snake immediately bit him on the wrist. As the man lay dying from the venom he asked the snake “Why did you bite me?” The snake replied “After all, I am a snake!” Politicians are, after all, politicians.
Note that not one of the recommendations of the National Association of Retired Border Patrol Agents is included in Rubio’s “Gang of 8” legislation – particularly the twice-recommended solution by the 9/11 Commission to implement an automated, off-the-shelf exit data program. That is because the real forces behind immigration “reform” are the radical Hispanic groups pushing for “Azatlan” political revenge and politicians reading demographic tea leaves seeking votes to stay in power. Make no mistake. This immigration reform bill is not the historical immigration policy Americans took pride in prior to 1965. Rubio’s “reform” is nothing more than a continuation of the ethnic revolution begun by Ted Kennedy in 1965. An immigration policy based on ethnicity rather than economics is having a catastrophic effect on America – as predicted. Like Obama’s Socialist revolution of American wealth re-distribution, Rubio’s bill will exponentially quicken the ethnic revolution destroying the American Identity with devastating political consequences.
