As we all know, the Left has been accusing President Trump of multiple nefarious crimes they themselves are guilty of. J6 is just one example.
As video evidence clearly shows, the J6 demonstrators were exhorted by agitators within the crowd to attack congress. Evidence exists that Nancy Pelosi ignored or denied a request by President Trump to provide 10,000 troops for the security of the capitol. The evidence also shows that at the precise moment the House of Representatives was hearing a legitimately constitutional objection to ratifying the results of the election, the Capitol police in unison removed the barricades and escorted the J6 demonstrators into the building, guided them through the halls, opened doors for them and stood aside to allow them access.
Whistle blowers continue to surface disputing the Stalinesque kangaroo court results of the Democrat-led J6 commission hearings. One of them is the Capitol Hill Chief of Police who states the J6 investigation was a “cover up” because they would not allow him to testify.
It is to be noted for the jury of public opinion that FBI Director Christopher Wray has repeatedly refused to answer the question “Were there FBI operatives inside the J6 crowd?” There is a very important reason he has refused to answer that question – and it has nothing to do with protecting his agents acting under the color of authority. He’s refusing to answer because they were not acting under color of authority. When any law enforcement agency acts outside the color of law they are subject to prosecution. The most frequent violation of this is when “a government official, such as a police officer, uses threats, fraud, or harassment to induce or coerce someone to commit a crime they wouldn’t ordinarily commit.” law enforcement creates in the mind of an otherwise innocent person the idea to commit a crime.” That’s called entrapment.
Entrapment by design occurs when defense counsel can prove that the government created or designed the crime they (the defendant) are accused of committing. A typical entrapment arises when law enforcement officers use coercion and other overbearing tactics to induce someone to commit a crime.
There is substantial case law covering the misconduct of law enforcement by this behavior. When defense counsel shows the state designed the crime and induced the otherwise innocent person to commit it, the case is thrown out of court and the defendants are not guilty. The gist of the entrapment defense is “in who’s mind did the crime originate?”
“The New York Times reports that an FBI informant who marched to the Capitol with fellow Proud Boys on Jan. 6 testified that he didn’t know of any plans for the group to invade the building and didn’t think they inspired the violence that day. – Michael Kunzelman, AP, March 29, 2023.
With congressional authority and the resources available to the same technical means the Democrats used to identify the hundreds of protestors for prosecution, it is possible to identify FBI informants instigating violence within the crowd. One man has already been identified as instigating violence within the crowd – which the FBI refuses to identify. There are probably others.
The current Republican J6 investigative committee should pursue that line of questioning and subpoena Wray before their committee. If he lies he can go to prison for perjury. He can’t plead operational security because the offense was committed outside the scope of authority. Once the identity of the FBI operatives are identified they can be singled out among the crowd and their behavior observed from the videos. I’ll bet a month of your pay they are the ones inciting the crowd to violence.
The committee needs to identify who gave the order to the Capitol police over their radios to remove the barriers in unison on both sides of the building – and who told that person to do so. In my opinion it was someone on the House floor coordinating removing the barricades with the objection to ratifying the results of the election. Those individuals are guilty of conspiracy to commit fraud – the exact thing President Trump is being accused of by another member of the Deep State “Special” Counsel Jack Smith (who bears a more than passing resemblance to Hunter Biden). Maybe its just the similar neurolinguistics of deception.
There’s an old common law concept called the “falling box” principle. It’s something like this: If you are walking beside a warehouse with an open window on the second floor and a box suddenly falls to the ground beside you, someone pushed that box outside the window. It didn’t occur on its’ own volition.
Neither did the incitement to violence, nor the simultaneous removal of the barricades with the objection to ratifying the ballots. It was a conspiracy to defraud the citizens of the United States executed with precision.
The Bolshoi ballet would be proud.
